From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 102351 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2017 14:19:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102324 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jun 2017 14:19:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=matthew, Hx-languages-length:727 X-HELO: mailapp01.imgtec.com Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com (HELO mailapp01.imgtec.com) (195.59.15.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:19:11 +0000 Received: from HHMAIL01.hh.imgtec.org (unknown [10.100.10.19]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id D55FE95856BE0; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 15:19:09 +0100 (IST) Received: from [10.20.78.168] (10.20.78.168) by HHMAIL01.hh.imgtec.org (10.100.10.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.294.0; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 15:19:12 +0100 Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:19:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Richard Sandiford , Matthew Fortune CC: Paul Hua , gcc-patches Subject: RE: [testsuite]MIPS remove duplicate div-x test In-Reply-To: <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B0235380CB0E46@hhmail02.hh.imgtec.org> Message-ID: References: <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B0235380CB0E46@hhmail02.hh.imgtec.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg00707.txt.bz2 On Sun, 4 Jun 2017, Matthew Fortune wrote: > > > There are duplicate testcase in gcc.target/mips dir. > > > > > > div-5.c same as div-9.c. > > > div-6.c same as div-10.c. > > > div-7.c same as div-11.c. > > > div-8.c same as div-12.c. > > > > > > Is this deliberate? > > I see no evidence of this being deliberate and has been like this since > the original commit. I suspect they were meant to be `-mgp64' vs `-mgp32' as with the mult-*.c tests also added with r181761 ("Explicitly record which registers are inaccessible") , but a typo has crept in. Richard, do you happen to remember anything about it? Maciej