From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17283 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2015 00:39:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17273 invoked by uid 89); 1 Feb 2015 00:39:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 00:39:17 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1YHiZC-0003ls-VN from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:39:11 -0800 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 00:39:09 +0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YHiZA-0006B7-9z; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 00:39:08 +0000 Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 00:39:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Yoshinori Sato CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add new target h8300-*-linux In-Reply-To: <8761bn9f7k.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Message-ID: References: <8761bzqkg1.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> <8761bn9f7k.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 On Sat, 31 Jan 2015, Yoshinori Sato wrote: > + * config/h8300/linux.h: New file. > + * config/h8300/t-linux: New file. These files don't appear to be included in the patch. > +h8300-*-linux*) > + tmake_file="t-linux h8300/t-linux t-fpbit" > + tm_file="$tm_file h8300/h8300-lib.h" > + ;; Is there a good reason for using fp-bit instead of soft-fp here? -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com