From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 76326 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2015 14:58:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 76317 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2015 14:58:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:58:46 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1ZXVyM-0006KU-Hr from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 07:58:42 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:58:41 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXVyJ-0004It-T7; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:58:39 +0000 Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:59:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Rich Felker CC: Subject: Re: Reviving SH FDPIC target In-Reply-To: <20150903005101.GN17773@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Message-ID: References: <20150902183650.GA16052@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20150902210535.GM17773@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20150903005101.GN17773@brightrain.aerifal.cx> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00266.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Rich Felker wrote: > So if __fpscr_values was the only reason for patch 1/3 in the FDPIC > patchset, I think we can safely drop it. And patch 2/3 was already > committed, so 3/3, the one I was originally looking at, seems to be > all we need. It was approved at the time, so I'll proceed with merging > it with 5.2.0. Well, obviously if trying dropping patch 1/3 you need to remove everything related to use_initial_val (the feature added in patch 1/3) from patch 3/3. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com