public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Kugan <kugan.vivekanandarajah@linaro.org>,
	Richard Henderson	<rth@redhat.com>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [0/7] Type promotion pass and elimination of zext/sext
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1510211711160.15989@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc3qfznoatCwmQ+qtk=QGykaMe8h1Q+C6R=ToBsfFvEwEg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Richard Biener wrote:

> Or maybe we should simply make GIMPLE _always_ adhere to the ABI
> details from the start (gimplification).  Note that this does not only involve
> PROMOTE_MODE.  Note that for what GIMPLE is concerned I'd only
> "lower" passing / returning in registers (whee, and then we have
> things like targetm.calls.split_complex_arg ... not to mention passing
> GIMPLE memory in registers).
> 
> Maybe I'm shooting too far here in the attempt to make GIMPLE closer
> to the target (to expose those redundant extensions on GIMPLE) and
> we'll end up with a bigger mess than with not doing this?

I don't know at what point target-specific promotion should appear, but 
right now it's visible before then (front ends use 
targetm.calls.promote_prototypes), which is definitely too early.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-21 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-07  2:55 Kugan
2015-09-07  2:57 ` [1/7] Add new tree code SEXT_EXPR Kugan
2015-09-15 13:20   ` Richard Biener
2015-10-11 10:35     ` Kugan
2015-10-12 12:22       ` Richard Biener
2015-10-15  5:49         ` Kugan
2015-10-21 10:49           ` Richard Biener
2015-09-07  2:58 ` [2/7] Add new type promotion pass Kugan
2015-10-15  5:52   ` Kugan
2015-10-15 22:47     ` Richard Henderson
2015-09-07  3:00 ` [3/7] Optimize ZEXT_EXPR with tree-vrp Kugan
2015-09-15 13:18   ` Richard Biener
2015-10-06 23:12     ` kugan
2015-10-07  8:20       ` Richard Biener
2015-10-07 23:40         ` Kugan
2015-10-09 10:29           ` Richard Biener
2015-10-11  2:56             ` Kugan
2015-10-12 12:13               ` Richard Biener
2015-09-07  3:01 ` [4/7] Use correct promoted mode sign for result of GIMPLE_CALL Kugan
2015-09-07 13:16   ` Michael Matz
2015-09-08  0:00     ` Kugan
2015-09-08 15:45       ` Jeff Law
2015-09-08 22:09         ` Jim Wilson
2015-09-15 12:51           ` Richard Biener
2015-10-07  1:03             ` kugan
2015-09-07  3:01 ` [5/7] Allow gimple debug stmt in widen mode Kugan
2015-09-07 13:46   ` Michael Matz
2015-09-08  0:01     ` Kugan
2015-09-15 13:02       ` Richard Biener
2015-10-15  5:45         ` Kugan
2015-10-16  9:27           ` Richard Biener
2015-10-18 20:51             ` Kugan
2015-09-07  3:03 ` Kugan
2015-09-07  3:03 ` [6/7] Temporary workaround to get aarch64 bootstrap Kugan
2015-09-07  5:54 ` [7/7] Adjust-arm-test cases Kugan
2015-11-02 11:43   ` Richard Earnshaw
2015-10-20 20:13 ` [0/7] Type promotion pass and elimination of zext/sext Kugan
2015-10-21 12:56   ` Richard Biener
2015-10-21 13:57     ` Richard Biener
2015-10-21 17:17       ` Joseph Myers [this message]
2015-10-21 18:11       ` Richard Henderson
2015-10-22 12:48         ` Richard Biener
2015-10-22 11:01     ` Kugan
2015-10-22 14:24       ` Richard Biener
2015-10-27  1:48         ` kugan
2015-10-28 15:51           ` Richard Biener
2015-11-02  9:17             ` Kugan
2015-11-03 14:40               ` Richard Biener
2015-11-08  9:43                 ` Kugan
2015-11-10 14:13                   ` Richard Biener
2015-11-12  6:08                     ` Kugan
2015-11-14  1:15                     ` Kugan
2015-11-18 14:04                       ` Richard Biener
2015-11-18 15:06                         ` Richard Biener
2015-11-24  2:52                           ` Kugan
2015-12-10  0:27                             ` Kugan
2015-12-16 13:18                               ` Richard Biener
     [not found] <A610E03AD50BFC4D95529A36D37FA55E8A7AB808CC@GEORGE.Emea.Arm.com>
2015-09-07 10:51 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2015-09-07 11:31   ` Kugan
2015-09-07 12:17     ` pinskia
2015-09-07 12:49       ` Wilco Dijkstra
2015-09-08  8:03       ` Renlin Li
2015-09-08 12:37         ` Wilco Dijkstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1510211711160.15989@digraph.polyomino.org.uk \
    --to=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=kugan.vivekanandarajah@linaro.org \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).