From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-412407-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 119755 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2015 20:35:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119746 invoked by uid 89); 2 Nov 2015 20:35:41 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (HELO mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr) (192.134.164.83) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 20:35:40 +0000
Received: from 81-64-207-100.rev.numericable.fr (HELO laptop-mg.local) ([81.64.207.100])  by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Nov 2015 21:35:36 +0100
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 20:35:00 -0000
From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
Reply-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
cc: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>,     Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>,     GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add -Wmisleading-indentation to -Wall
In-Reply-To: <1446492912.2994.102.camel@surprise>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1511022134001.2443@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>
References: <1446137381-32748-1-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com>  <1446137381-32748-5-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com>  <5632597B.2020205@redhat.com>  <CAFiYyc2Dps236sGmHZe6pfXdP5E_pfiYE_LBx76WW9-7q+VV=Q@mail.gmail.com>  <CA+C-WL_jkYx77NAtaZLOGG5XRZLhY0ha3D+NSgJoXXysRQTLCg@mail.gmail.com>  <1446481314.2994.27.camel@surprise>  <alpine.DEB.2.20.8.1511021334490.17787@idea> <1446492912.2994.102.camel@surprise>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015, David Malcolm wrote:

> I think we want the first kind of thing at -Wall, but I'm not so keen on
> the second kind at -Wall.  Is there precedent for "levels" of a warning?
> (so e.g. pedantry level 1 at -Wall, level 2 at -Wextra, and have patch 1
> be the difference between levels 1 and 2?)

You mean something like -Wstrict-overflow=n?

-- 
Marc Glisse