From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-434274-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 65525 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2016 11:06:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 63508 invoked by uid 89); 19 Aug 2016 11:06:19 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com
Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:06:09 +0000
Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=SVR-IES-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com)	by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp 	id 1bahch-0001ve-Sd from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 04:06:04 -0700
Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.106) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:06:01 +0100
Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost)	by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)	(envelope-from <joseph@codesourcery.com>)	id 1bahcd-0001v4-L7; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:05:59 +0000
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:06:00 -0000
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
CC: James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>, GCC Patches	<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>, Richard Earnshaw <richard.earnshaw@arm.com>, Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>, Ramana Radhakrishnan	<ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>, Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@arm.com>,	David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>, Segher Boessenkool	<segher@kernel.crashing.org>, Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,	<murphyp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <nd@arm.com>, <per@bothner.com>,	<dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Implement C _FloatN, _FloatNx types [version 6]
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc3xqcqJ1rK2X0rC+wwpx3akHbULVG1G47PRmtk4wTk=7A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1608191101110.30687@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606211202040.4526@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606211738200.31330@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606231418120.21240@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606271720270.7438@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1607191347340.9265@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1607222158330.22448@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20160817154244.GA39270@arm.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1608171641000.7156@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1608172015080.27199@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <CAFiYyc3xqcqJ1rK2X0rC+wwpx3akHbULVG1G47PRmtk4wTk=7A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg01399.txt.bz2

On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Richard Biener wrote:

> Ok if libcpp maintainers do not object.

I consider the libcpp changes something I can self-approve - but, any 
comments?

> Can you quickly verify if LTO works with the new types?  I don't see anything
> that would prevent it but having new global trees and backends initializing them
> might come up with surprises (see tree-streamer.c:preload_common_nodes)

Well, the execution tests are in gcc.dg/torture, which is run with various 
options including -flto (and I've checked the testsuite logs to confirm 
these tests are indeed run with such options).  Is there something else 
you think should be tested?

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com