From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-434393-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 113402 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2016 11:23:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113376 invoked by uid 89); 22 Aug 2016 11:23:15 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=fselftest, sk:82c85ab, janbenedict, Glaw
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com
Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:23:05 +0000
Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com)	by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp 	id 1bbnJl-0007Jk-0J from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 04:23:01 -0700
Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:22:59 +0100
Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost)	by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)	(envelope-from <joseph@codesourcery.com>)	id 1bbnJi-0002cK-6Y; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:22:58 +0000
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:23:00 -0000
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
CC: James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>, <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,	<fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, <jason@redhat.com>, <richard.earnshaw@arm.com>,	<nickc@redhat.com>, <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>,	<marcus.shawcroft@arm.com>, <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,	<segher@kernel.crashing.org>, <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,	<murphyp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUILDROBOT] x86_64: Segmentation fault during -fself-test (was: Implement C _FloatN, _FloatNx types [version 6]
In-Reply-To: <20160822080915.GC1819@lug-owl.de>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1608221122200.32194@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606211202040.4526@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606211738200.31330@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606231418120.21240@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606271720270.7438@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1607191347340.9265@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1607222158330.22448@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20160817154244.GA39270@arm.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1608171641000.7156@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1608172015080.27199@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20160822080915.GC1819@lug-owl.de>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg01518.txt.bz2

On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:

> Between dee8cef0c1c1ebf85fceb5c37996ed12a2bec352 (Fri Aug 19 15:42:11
> 2016 +0000) and 82c85aba845985e55c27a7a9c448810d433adb17 (Fri Aug 19
> 17:43:26 2016 +0000), a new build regression for
> x86_64-{linux,rtems,elf} showed up and I think this patch caused it.

I do not see this in my x86_64-pc-linux-gnu tests (and the logs show those 
builds do run the self-tests as expected).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com