From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29096 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2016 16:16:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29084 invoked by uid 89); 13 Sep 2016 16:16:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:15:55 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1bjqNE-0000Ih-QF from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:15:52 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.87) by svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:15:49 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bjqN7-0003NN-Lm; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:15:45 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:23:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Segher Boessenkool CC: Bernd Schmidt , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Put a TARGET_LRA_P into every target In-Reply-To: <20160913110349.GA18438@gate.crashing.org> Message-ID: References: <20160913110349.GA18438@gate.crashing.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) To svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00753.txt.bz2 On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Yes, many targets need the hook definition after this series; that should > stick out like a sore thumb, help to remind people to change their target > to use LRA (not a huge amount of work for most, although it can get tricky). I would also encourage an email to all the maintainers of ports using reload, CC gcc@, pointing out that moving is desirable and with pointers to guidance on how to do the move. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com