From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 79539 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2016 15:51:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 79530 invoked by uid 89); 12 Oct 2016 15:51:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=equally, maintainance, H*f:CAFiYyc0, H*i:sk:GT4v-GU X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:51:39 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1buLoe-0001K0-93 from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 08:51:36 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.87) by svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:51:32 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1buLoV-00080c-JZ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:51:27 +0000 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:51:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Richard Biener CC: Bernd Schmidt , John David Anglin , Jakub Jelinek , Florian Weimer , Carlos O'Donell , Jason Merrill , Bernd Edlinger , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Jeff Law Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement new hook for max_align_t_align In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <305D4697-79B3-4B69-8741-98BFC00A5ECE@bell.net> <856A3FEF-7A0D-43D4-9CBF-23939E7861C4@bell.net> <6C68EDB9-5933-4127-978E-807ABC7F31C7@bell.net> <519be582-d8e5-a6ef-f699-90a21250180b@bell.net> <88e889ee-dec9-5fef-db19-02f4d91d9156@redhat.com> <20161012072540.GJ7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <20161012080208.GK7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <946f9b72-ca43-9306-9546-20b32793f9e0@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) To svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00933.txt.bz2 On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Richard Biener wrote: > I'd say what applies to PA should apply equally well to the pdp11 and > the alpha port ... > > But usually the question is just whether the port has a maintainer > and/or whether it is > a maintainance burden to keep it (say, last user of obsolete feature X). Last users of obsolete feature "defines TARGET_HAVE_NAMED_SECTIONS to false": 32-bit PA HP-UX (64-bit HP-UX is ELF like GNU/Linux, so OK), pdp11, pre-ELF OpenBSD ports. (I'm not aware of that obsolete feature particularly causing problems, however. But the implication for pdp11 would be that if the port were to stay with that feature being removed, it should move to ELF - the e_machine value EM_PDP11 having been allocated by Lars Brinkhoff on 30 May 2002, but I don't know if there's an ABI.) -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com