From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 62265 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2017 19:51:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 62250 invoked by uid 89); 21 Apr 2017 19:50:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_1,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:50:58 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1d1ea0-0001He-Nb from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:50:56 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.87) by svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:50:53 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1eZt-0004fv-T4; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:50:49 +0000 Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:27:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Bernd Edlinger CC: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Nathan Sidwell , Jan Hubicka Subject: Re: [PATCH] Force use of absolute path names for gcov In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) To svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg00965.txt.bz2 On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > So I would like to add a -fprofile-abs-path option that > forces absolute path names in gcno files, which allows gcov > to get the true canonicalized source name. I don't see any actual documentation of this option in the patch (you add it to the summary list of options, and mention it in text under the documentation of --coverage, but don't have any actual @item -fprofile-abs-path / @opindex fprofile-abs-path paragraph with text describing what the option does). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com