* Allow some NOP conversions in (X+CST1)+CST2 in match.pd
@ 2017-05-21 19:45 Marc Glisse
2017-05-24 8:47 ` Richard Biener
2017-05-27 8:30 ` Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marc Glisse @ 2017-05-21 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 602 bytes --]
Hello,
generalizing a bit one transformation, to avoid a regression with another
patch I am working on. Handling conversions always gets messy :-( It would
have been easier to stick to scalars and wide_int, but since the existing
transformation handles vectors, I didn't want to regress.
Bootstrap+testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu.
2017-05-22 Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
gcc/
* match.pd ((A +- CST1) +- CST2): Allow some conversions.
* tree.c (drop_tree_overflow): Handle COMPLEX_CST and VECTOR_CST.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/addadd.c: New file.
--
Marc Glisse
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: TEXT/x-diff; name=conv.patch, Size: 5260 bytes --]
Index: match.pd
===================================================================
--- match.pd (revision 248312)
+++ match.pd (working copy)
@@ -1265,29 +1265,53 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
(simplify
(minus @0 (plus:c @0 @1))
(negate @1))
(simplify
(minus @0 (minus @0 @1))
@1)
/* (A +- CST1) +- CST2 -> A + CST3 */
(for outer_op (plus minus)
(for inner_op (plus minus)
+ neg_inner_op (minus plus)
(simplify
- (outer_op (inner_op @0 CONSTANT_CLASS_P@1) CONSTANT_CLASS_P@2)
- /* If the constant operation overflows we cannot do the transform
- as we would introduce undefined overflow, for example
- with (a - 1) + INT_MIN. */
- (with { tree cst = const_binop (outer_op == inner_op
- ? PLUS_EXPR : MINUS_EXPR, type, @1, @2); }
- (if (cst && !TREE_OVERFLOW (cst))
- (inner_op @0 { cst; } ))))))
+ (outer_op (convert? (inner_op @0 CONSTANT_CLASS_P@1)) CONSTANT_CLASS_P@2)
+ (if (tree_nop_conversion_p (type, TREE_TYPE (@0)))
+ /* If one of the types wraps, use that one. */
+ (if (!ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) || TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type))
+ (if (outer_op == PLUS_EXPR)
+ (plus (convert @0) (inner_op @2 (convert @1)))
+ (minus (convert @0) (neg_inner_op @2 (convert @1))))
+ (if (!ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0))
+ || TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (TREE_TYPE (@0)))
+ (if (outer_op == PLUS_EXPR)
+ (convert (plus @0 (inner_op (convert @2) @1)))
+ (convert (minus @0 (neg_inner_op (convert @2) @1))))
+ /* If the constant operation overflows we cannot do the transform
+ directly as we would introduce undefined overflow, for example
+ with (a - 1) + INT_MIN. */
+ (if (types_match (type, @0))
+ (with { tree cst = const_binop (outer_op == inner_op
+ ? PLUS_EXPR : MINUS_EXPR,
+ type, @1, @2); }
+ (if (cst && !TREE_OVERFLOW (cst))
+ (inner_op @0 { cst; } )
+ /* X+INT_MAX+1 is X-INT_MIN. */
+ (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && cst
+ && wi::eq_p (cst, wi::min_value (type)))
+ (neg_inner_op @0 { wide_int_to_tree (type, cst); })
+ /* Last resort, use some unsigned type. */
+ (with { tree utype = unsigned_type_for (type); }
+ (convert (inner_op
+ (convert:utype @0)
+ (convert:utype
+ { drop_tree_overflow (cst); }))))))))))))))
/* (CST1 - A) +- CST2 -> CST3 - A */
(for outer_op (plus minus)
(simplify
(outer_op (minus CONSTANT_CLASS_P@1 @0) CONSTANT_CLASS_P@2)
(with { tree cst = const_binop (outer_op, type, @1, @2); }
(if (cst && !TREE_OVERFLOW (cst))
(minus { cst; } @0)))))
/* CST1 - (CST2 - A) -> CST3 + A */
Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/addadd.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/addadd.c (nonexistent)
+++ testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/addadd.c (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
+
+int f(unsigned x){
+ x += 123;
+ int y = x;
+ y -= 99;
+ return y;
+}
+unsigned g(int x){
+ x += 123;
+ unsigned y = x;
+ y -= 99;
+ return y;
+}
+int h(int x){
+ x += __INT_MAX__;
+ x += 1;
+ return x;
+}
+int i(int x){
+ x += __INT_MAX__;
+ x += __INT_MAX__;
+ return x;
+}
+typedef int S __attribute__((vector_size(16)));
+void j(S*x){
+ *x += __INT_MAX__;
+ *x += __INT_MAX__;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " \\+ 24;" 2 "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\(unsigned int\\)" 2 "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "2147483647" "optimized" } } */
Index: tree.c
===================================================================
--- tree.c (revision 248312)
+++ tree.c (working copy)
@@ -13131,20 +13131,39 @@ drop_tree_overflow (tree t)
gcc_checking_assert (TREE_OVERFLOW (t));
/* For tree codes with a sharing machinery re-build the result. */
if (TREE_CODE (t) == INTEGER_CST)
return wide_int_to_tree (TREE_TYPE (t), t);
/* Otherwise, as all tcc_constants are possibly shared, copy the node
and drop the flag. */
t = copy_node (t);
TREE_OVERFLOW (t) = 0;
+
+ /* For constants that contain nested constants, drop the flag
+ from those as well. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (t) == COMPLEX_CST)
+ {
+ if (TREE_OVERFLOW (TREE_REALPART (t)))
+ TREE_REALPART (t) = drop_tree_overflow (TREE_REALPART (t));
+ if (TREE_OVERFLOW (TREE_IMAGPART (t)))
+ TREE_IMAGPART (t) = drop_tree_overflow (TREE_IMAGPART (t));
+ }
+ if (TREE_CODE (t) == VECTOR_CST)
+ {
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < VECTOR_CST_NELTS (t); ++i)
+ {
+ tree& elt = VECTOR_CST_ELT (t, i);
+ if (TREE_OVERFLOW (elt))
+ elt = drop_tree_overflow (elt);
+ }
+ }
return t;
}
/* Given a memory reference expression T, return its base address.
The base address of a memory reference expression is the main
object being referenced. For instance, the base address for
'array[i].fld[j]' is 'array'. You can think of this as stripping
away the offset part from a memory address.
This function calls handled_component_p to strip away all the inner
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow some NOP conversions in (X+CST1)+CST2 in match.pd
2017-05-21 19:45 Allow some NOP conversions in (X+CST1)+CST2 in match.pd Marc Glisse
@ 2017-05-24 8:47 ` Richard Biener
2017-05-27 8:30 ` Jakub Jelinek
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2017-05-24 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Glisse; +Cc: GCC Patches
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> generalizing a bit one transformation, to avoid a regression with another
> patch I am working on. Handling conversions always gets messy :-( It would
> have been easier to stick to scalars and wide_int, but since the existing
> transformation handles vectors, I didn't want to regress.
The pattern looks a bit unwieldly now ;) I pondered a bit but
couldn't really find
a better way to handle things.
Thus, ok.
Richard.
> Bootstrap+testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> 2017-05-22 Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
>
> gcc/
> * match.pd ((A +- CST1) +- CST2): Allow some conversions.
> * tree.c (drop_tree_overflow): Handle COMPLEX_CST and VECTOR_CST.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/addadd.c: New file.
>
> --
> Marc Glisse
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow some NOP conversions in (X+CST1)+CST2 in match.pd
2017-05-21 19:45 Allow some NOP conversions in (X+CST1)+CST2 in match.pd Marc Glisse
2017-05-24 8:47 ` Richard Biener
@ 2017-05-27 8:30 ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-05-27 8:41 ` Marc Glisse
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2017-05-27 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Glisse; +Cc: gcc-patches
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 09:22:56PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
> generalizing a bit one transformation, to avoid a regression with another
> patch I am working on. Handling conversions always gets messy :-( It would
> have been easier to stick to scalars and wide_int, but since the existing
> transformation handles vectors, I didn't want to regress.
>
> Bootstrap+testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> 2017-05-22 Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
>
> gcc/
> * match.pd ((A +- CST1) +- CST2): Allow some conversions.
> * tree.c (drop_tree_overflow): Handle COMPLEX_CST and VECTOR_CST.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/addadd.c: New file.
After discussions in PR80887, I've reverted the match.pd part and xfailed
the test, because it breaks bootstrap and will take a while to resolve
properly.
2017-05-27 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR bootstrap/80887
Revert:
2017-05-25 Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
* match.pd ((A +- CST1) +- CST2): Allow some conversions.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/addadd.c: Xfail all scan-tree-dump*.
--- gcc/match.pd (revision 248448)
+++ gcc/match.pd (revision 248447)
@@ -1299,39 +1299,15 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
/* (A +- CST1) +- CST2 -> A + CST3 */
(for outer_op (plus minus)
(for inner_op (plus minus)
- neg_inner_op (minus plus)
(simplify
- (outer_op (convert? (inner_op @0 CONSTANT_CLASS_P@1)) CONSTANT_CLASS_P@2)
- (if (tree_nop_conversion_p (type, TREE_TYPE (@0)))
- /* If one of the types wraps, use that one. */
- (if (!ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) || TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type))
- (if (outer_op == PLUS_EXPR)
- (plus (convert @0) (inner_op @2 (convert @1)))
- (minus (convert @0) (neg_inner_op @2 (convert @1))))
- (if (!ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0))
- || TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (TREE_TYPE (@0)))
- (if (outer_op == PLUS_EXPR)
- (convert (plus @0 (inner_op (convert @2) @1)))
- (convert (minus @0 (neg_inner_op (convert @2) @1))))
- /* If the constant operation overflows we cannot do the transform
- directly as we would introduce undefined overflow, for example
- with (a - 1) + INT_MIN. */
- (if (types_match (type, @0))
- (with { tree cst = const_binop (outer_op == inner_op
- ? PLUS_EXPR : MINUS_EXPR,
- type, @1, @2); }
- (if (cst && !TREE_OVERFLOW (cst))
- (inner_op @0 { cst; } )
- /* X+INT_MAX+1 is X-INT_MIN. */
- (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && cst
- && wi::eq_p (cst, wi::min_value (type)))
- (neg_inner_op @0 { wide_int_to_tree (type, cst); })
- /* Last resort, use some unsigned type. */
- (with { tree utype = unsigned_type_for (type); }
- (convert (inner_op
- (convert:utype @0)
- (convert:utype
- { drop_tree_overflow (cst); }))))))))))))))
+ (outer_op (inner_op @0 CONSTANT_CLASS_P@1) CONSTANT_CLASS_P@2)
+ /* If the constant operation overflows we cannot do the transform
+ as we would introduce undefined overflow, for example
+ with (a - 1) + INT_MIN. */
+ (with { tree cst = const_binop (outer_op == inner_op
+ ? PLUS_EXPR : MINUS_EXPR, type, @1, @2); }
+ (if (cst && !TREE_OVERFLOW (cst))
+ (inner_op @0 { cst; } ))))))
/* (CST1 - A) +- CST2 -> CST3 - A */
(for outer_op (plus minus)
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/addadd.c (revision 248532)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/addadd.c (working copy)
@@ -29,6 +29,6 @@ void j(S*x){
*x += __INT_MAX__;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " \\+ 24;" 2 "optimized" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\(unsigned int\\)" 2 "optimized" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "2147483647" "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " \\+ 24;" 2 "optimized" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\(unsigned int\\)" 2 "optimized" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "2147483647" "optimized" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-27 8:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-21 19:45 Allow some NOP conversions in (X+CST1)+CST2 in match.pd Marc Glisse
2017-05-24 8:47 ` Richard Biener
2017-05-27 8:30 ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-05-27 8:41 ` Marc Glisse
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).