From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23083 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2017 16:04:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23052 invoked by uid 89); 2 Aug 2017 16:04:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-10.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 16:04:33 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1dcw8L-0005QJ-1e from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 09:04:29 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.87) by svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 17:04:26 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcw8E-00009s-B4; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 16:04:22 +0000 Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 16:04:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Jakub Jelinek CC: Bill Schmidt , GCC Patches , Segher Boessenkool , David Edelsohn Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Clean up capitalized diagnostic messages In-Reply-To: <20170802155511.GL2123@tucnak> Message-ID: References: <9a2980f0-01ed-1474-c4a2-f743695d60f8@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170802155511.GL2123@tucnak> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-02.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.2) To svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) X-SW-Source: 2017-08/txt/msg00193.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 10:29:20AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote: > > --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (revision 250791) > > +++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (working copy) > > @@ -4132,7 +4132,7 @@ rs6000_option_override_internal (bool global_init_ > > || rs6000_cpu == PROCESSOR_PPCE5500) > > { > > if (TARGET_ALTIVEC) > > - error ("AltiVec not supported in this target"); > > + error ("altivec not supported in this target"); > > If AltiVec is spelled that way always, then I think we want to keep it > capitalized, but CCing Joseph just to be sure. Or the diagnostics Yes, if it would be capitalized mid-sentence then it should be capitalized at the start of a diagnostic (and if it wouldn't be capitalized mid-sentence, it shouldn't be capitalized at the start of a diagnostic). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com