From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5275 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2019 18:04:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5253 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jan 2019 18:03:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Sandra, wish X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 18:03:58 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:256) id 1ghICp-0000aY-5U from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 10:03:55 -0800 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.90) by svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 18:03:51 +0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ghICl-0007wN-4u; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 18:03:51 +0000 Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 18:04:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Sandra Loosemore CC: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , , Subject: Re: [patch, rfa] Fix PR other/16615, change "can not" to "cannot" throughout docs and code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg00498.txt.bz2 On Tue, 8 Jan 2019, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > Here are the ChangeLogs for the new patch series. Parts 1, 2, and 3 are > mechanically generated via sed (etc). Part 4 is the hand-edited changes, > identical to part 2 of the previous series except for excluding a couple > files. Part 5 is the regenerated gcc.pot file. Does this version look OK to > commit? OK. Presumably the Go and D maintainers may wish to apply those changes from the previous patch version, following the processes used for those directories. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com