From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from angie.orcam.me.uk (angie.orcam.me.uk [IPv6:2001:4190:8020::34]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1704E3858C33 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 13:22:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1704E3858C33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=orcam.me.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=orcam.me.uk Received: by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2FED892009C; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 15:22:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC6192009B; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 14:22:55 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 14:22:55 +0100 (BST) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Dimitrije Milosevic cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Djordje Todorovic Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mips: Fix the ASAN shadow offset hook for the n32 ABI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3489.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 13:22:58 -0000 On Mon, 6 Jun 2022, Dimitrije Milosevic wrote: > * config/mips/mips.cc (mips_asan_shadow_offset): Reformat > to handle the N32 ABI. That's not what the change does. > * config/mips/mips.h (SUBTARGET_SHADOW_OFFSET): Remove > the macro, as it is not needed anymore. Why is the macro not needed anymore? I can see the change has already been committed, but no proper review was done and I can hardly see how anyone can know why this change is correct. If someone looks at it say in 10 years' time they can only try to guess. Maciej