From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from esa4.mentor.iphmx.com (esa4.mentor.iphmx.com [68.232.137.252]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32B523944800 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 21:06:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 32B523944800 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codesourcery.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=joseph_myers@mentor.com IronPort-SDR: IsufGZNq7wy7rOkFzLprEzjr8K8COiM+xiw3pIe7eY0DTBUYfyYG4H88Ij6hM7Hcvk70BmuBxi u64rYgJFpj10K01Dkxm3SlKoZFBu34bNsrpWcSMWbYf8s5pigV+xtTrVjtQ/07Dw39T6LGHsGv V3YtZw8nUktdAY8obmnWU8I3U4j98xjzPNod1QDm8bJMXobqBNas/JvjvYNgT89jAxY2BWqaiy ZPE6ANyl88IAp62WJD2C06/TiC1yDEPsY0gXugp/yLvh5ay5ycfa3nXWmvnDNQqUn6KIH72fNr xD4= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,451,1596528000"; d="scan'208";a="54813275" Received: from orw-gwy-01-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.165]) by esa4.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2020 13:06:07 -0800 IronPort-SDR: LypGxBSyvK6Qe5FobUucpIJjcIUgeE9pYEYno13NyvrBv62KTCl0zKStE27gDHJ/nRkxiBstTQ wH936+0EOISBjCVGnHUcDsS/KUyuZoUZypY3/xTdSTWMcc0Ca3PkOlT5Ep1vBSW5/hADOrvxHQ llOVc5ghmHBUQFb0FnHWX7g2aNWkqdPiX8IUTXXS2gUTWf4N3NcMw5uR+65A4KfPFBstCiYyeV qbyUy2m5CkLOwL293qfwo0QMtMlLpgg6Nf9rcsxL3VfezuXlrPAlzLniKcJQjy+L9SoIiad80t OUQ= Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 21:06:02 +0000 From: Joseph Myers X-X-Sender: jsm28@digraph.polyomino.org.uk To: Raoni Fassina Firmino CC: Richard Biener , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] rtl: builtins: (not just) rs6000: Add builtins for fegetround, feclearexcept and feraiseexcept [PR94193] In-Reply-To: <20201104151049.psotxu7xarcxmv5g@work-tp> Message-ID: References: <20201103231150.zlqccshb3qw63bdv@work-tp> <20201104151049.psotxu7xarcxmv5g@work-tp> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90] X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-09.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.9) To svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3125.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 21:06:11 -0000 On Wed, 4 Nov 2020, Raoni Fassina Firmino via Gcc-patches wrote: > IMHO, It seems like it is not necessary if there not a libc that have > different values for the FE_* macros. I didn't check other archs, but if > is the case for some other arch I think it could be changed if and when > some other arch implements expands for these builtins. SPARC is the case I know of where the FE_* values vary depending on target libc (see the SPARC_LOW_FE_EXCEPT_VALUES target macro). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com