From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <joseph_myers@mentor.com>
Received: from esa4.mentor.iphmx.com (esa4.mentor.iphmx.com [68.232.137.252])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18B6E3858023
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 22:33:16 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 18B6E3858023
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=codesourcery.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=joseph_myers@mentor.com
IronPort-SDR: ldHaLKiSwcZNYz525krldFrQQr2aGGlU1VieVvK8lwc21Q81IaEopPCCbGDlNIH0X/g4yVDQ4T
 s64STtG5LmVBWEpSQibpzQDxSaxLR0dCejWZEPHF2RknF6+tQ3NKhdovxbWWJ+DwJM2YA6OeWg
 Ro9SjBMebvob4/TAUVlCQHJtLZsNUS5NooNKbKz7Uhq9wNrA5vgkcQZwZgV5rh1VLF7Z3qYm8A
 xEIJf0IOC+hiBW5J/UkfuFrSRaiINP9fvTXmXVu2OpVY2uqe+8eW7AOVtdsu5XrQ02GXNdpxBa
 hRs=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,238,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="59100583"
Received: from orw-gwy-01-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.165])
 by esa4.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2021 14:33:15 -0800
IronPort-SDR: npOXM3KVP/DSgu0xCMkacd7FqQ1/uy8/IoTCUv7JC1SWd4k59D2yPJJBCEOM+Q0PCU9AWpyc0d
 I20OK0tkUBXXCnS9COGW+5zwikITHoyKnXedccj4kkyagItfE+lAF545o727DPZZDOTTYfiGBH
 L7J3mo2OaJPAaxkS8ckwS7jMIpSpDoj2iYfLuLQFM74f6qwfJpidSzbmj6UzlvQyWsRYFw1TES
 jDPegVE4jp1B+AU9CLsFzVPvYL9GbdYKMQ/06xbsE7+lfFAAaX4asHuAtD8puZHIqQVOZ4gZSq
 k6s=
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 22:33:09 +0000
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
X-X-Sender: jsm28@digraph.polyomino.org.uk
To: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
CC: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>, Segher
 Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: xfail fetestexcept test - ppc always uses fcmpu
In-Reply-To: <orim5zcrex.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2103102231310.797684@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <orim5zcrex.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90]
X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-06.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.6) To
 svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3122.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 22:33:17 -0000

On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> operand exception for quiet NaN.  I couldn't find any evidence that
> the rs6000 backend ever outputs fcmpo.  Therefore, I'm adding the same
> execution xfail marker to this test.

In my view, such an XFAIL (for a GCC bug as opposed to an environmental 
issue) should have a comment pointing to a corresponding open bug in GCC 
Bugzilla.  In this case, that's bug 58684.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com