From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Vaseeharan Vinayagamoorthy <Vaseeharan.Vinayagamoorthy@arm.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tree-optimization/107672 - avoid vector mode type_for_mode call
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 21:08:28 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2211252107530.3568@rguenther-XPS-13-9380> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB9PR08MB6474CBE326ADC026B9285947810E9@DB9PR08MB6474.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5616 bytes --]
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022, Vaseeharan Vinayagamoorthy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am seeing an internal compiler error, related to this patch:
Can you please open a bugzilla for this and attach preprocessed
source so I can reproduce the ICE with a cc1 cross compiler?
Thanks,
Richard.
>
> during GIMPLE pass: slp
>
> options-save.cc: In function 'void cl_optimization_restore(gcc_options*,
> gcc_options*, cl_optimization*)':
>
> options-save.cc:1292:1: internal compiler error: in
> supportable_widening_operation, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:12199
>
>
>
> 1292 | cl_optimization_restore (struct gcc_options *opts, struct
> gcc_options *opts_set,
>
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/profile-count.cc: In member function 'int
> profile_count::to_cgraph_frequency(profile_count) const':
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/profile-count.cc:308:1: note: parameter passing for argument
> of type 'profile_count' changed in GCC 9.1
>
> 308 | profile_count::to_cgraph_frequency (profile_count entry_bb_count)
> const
>
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/profile-count.cc: In member function 'sreal
> profile_count::to_sreal_scale(profile_count, bool*) const':
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/profile-count.cc:326:1: note: parameter passing for argument
> of type 'profile_count' changed in GCC 9.1
>
> 326 | profile_count::to_sreal_scale (profile_count in, bool *known) const
>
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> 0x2195bdd supportable_widening_operation(vec_info*, tree_code,
> _stmt_vec_info*, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_code*, tree_code*, int*,
> vec<tree_node*, va_heap, vl_ptr>*)
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc:12199
>
> 0x2180493 vectorizable_conversion
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc:5064
>
> 0x2192fdd vect_analyze_stmt(vec_info*, _stmt_vec_info*, bool*, _slp_tree*,
> _slp_instance*, vec<stmt_info_for_cost, va_heap, vl_ptr>*)
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc:11256
>
>
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/profile-count.cc: In member function 'profile_count
> profile_count::combine_with_ipa_count(profile_count)':
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/profile-count.cc:398:1: note: parameter passing for argument
> of type 'profile_count' changed in GCC 9.1
>
> 398 | profile_count::combine_with_ipa_count (profile_count ipa)
>
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> 0x14f95d1 vect_slp_analyze_node_operations_1
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc:5958
>
> 0x14f9c19 vect_slp_analyze_node_operations
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc:6147
>
> 0x14f9b4d vect_slp_analyze_node_operations
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc:6126
>
> 0x14fa439 vect_slp_analyze_operations(vec_info*)
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc:6387
>
> 0x14fd423 vect_slp_analyze_bb_1
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc:7372
>
> 0x14fd599 vect_slp_region
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc:7419
>
> 0x14fe0d1 vect_slp_bbs
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc:7610
>
> 0x14fe46f vect_slp_function(function*)
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc:7698
>
> 0x151a109 execute
>
> /…/src/gcc/gcc/tree-vectorizer.cc:1532
>
> Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using
> -freport-bug).
>
> Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
>
> See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
>
> Makefile:1146: recipe for target 'options-save.o' failed
>
> make[3]: *** [options-save.o] Error 1
>
>
>
> That happens when building the arm-none-linux-gnueabihf toolchain natively
> with glibc bootstrap:
> Build:arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
> Host:arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
> Target: arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
>
> The compiler being used to build the toolchain is gcc 7.5.0.
>
>
> Kind regards
> Vasee
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> From: Gcc-patches <gcc-patches-bounces+vvinayag=arm.com@gcc.gnu.org> on
> behalf of Richard Biener via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
> Sent: 22 November 2022 08:48
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] tree-optimization/107672 - avoid vector mode type_for_mode
> call
> The following avoids using type_for_mode on vector modes which might
> not work for all frontends. Instead we look for the inner mode
> type and use build_vector_type_for_mode instead.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.
>
> PR tree-optimization/107672
> * tree-vect-stmts.cc (supportable_widening_operation): Avoid
> type_for_mode on vector modes.
> ---
> gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
> index bc0ef136f19..b35b986889d 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
> @@ -12195,9 +12195,15 @@ supportable_widening_operation (vec_info *vinfo,
> intermediate_type
> = vect_halve_mask_nunits (prev_type, intermediate_mode);
> else
> - intermediate_type
> - = lang_hooks.types.type_for_mode (intermediate_mode,
> - TYPE_UNSIGNED (prev_type));
> + {
> + gcc_assert (VECTOR_MODE_P (intermediate_mode));
> + tree intermediate_element_type
> + = lang_hooks.types.type_for_mode (GET_MODE_INNER
> (intermediate_mode),
> + TYPE_UNSIGNED (prev_type));
> + intermediate_type
> + = build_vector_type_for_mode (intermediate_element_type,
> + intermediate_mode);
> + }
>
> if (VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (intermediate_type)
> && VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (prev_type)
> --
> 2.35.3
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-25 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-22 8:48 Richard Biener
2022-11-25 13:30 ` Vaseeharan Vinayagamoorthy
2022-11-25 20:08 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2022-11-28 16:06 ` Alex Coplan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2211252107530.3568@rguenther-XPS-13-9380 \
--to=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=Vaseeharan.Vinayagamoorthy@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).