From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26767 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2020 23:48:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26649 invoked by uid 89); 13 Feb 2020 23:48:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=NONE, HX-Languages-Length:900, H*f:sk:87a75p9 X-HELO: esa2.hgst.iphmx.com Received: from esa2.hgst.iphmx.com (HELO esa2.hgst.iphmx.com) (68.232.143.124) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 23:48:28 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wdc.com; i=@wdc.com; q=dns/txt; s=dkim.wdc.com; t=1581637701; x=1613173701; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=ZAvNmLqhMb27g5Hf1CSPYL9w5IkoBDT4/AneU2XdHIQ=; b=Xh/Wkvw9iYoOYJS2cwFzpRRDrcPTVWbPXoVDU5rPs5pbk8BVPaL68J9t CcySjo24jtDQvtDd2Gw2Y1qVMDvcFPwhb6MQ47HRsvbhn8lmRDqeE1N2C w68BHzP12kX4M9jt8LS4C5DpT/b4rjYEXpy9nzgiXneFIWvKC4oQW3RUD ljOlcUqNIOZJ7wexY5rLnJgvFYC6WKS8CfxV9sHafOKJd9gIaKc/IR0rZ xGgPQ/Rw+DTwFTu5AY7UtwImHA/oQs17NrI3jVX7lQmkHogUaKw73Yr94 xp0I46Zyw3S45pbd6ymi89Au5hoJRlJCM9DeHDe9qZcSn/sW7fTUzCAbG Q==; IronPort-SDR: U7wPUXlO8y5p4j5MYUozZGyHoaZm7ViChJt6yxiUQx33bOQCnDO/hzFRPKo9Zzriinmby9C4pC ZFykA4mO4gR3DRqdnJVF+ZQ/JikckVsAn5ES+aYEyH0c1LifXRqJkq5OrU5WlnXKjmIZrxTTZ2 rkiQBsQQ3bpiOanKOn6J5z7H6G7N9avk3THqFcFw0Z8fO/fo9zX5aEN08n38lyXJcjg809NvVg vjstLudRF9/SpUPKUaIKF/gGHTzyWkfjW4/9w3EAPFd3wU+skg6EwxdFSFajyfjdVvlE0CnKds Maw= Received: from uls-op-cesaip01.wdc.com (HELO uls-op-cesaep01.wdc.com) ([199.255.45.14]) by ob1.hgst.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2020 07:48:19 +0800 IronPort-SDR: XH5JU1r5rIS0xqaDL3f6YPLUpV7A07ritVxaP6z2RRLGBBPstnOo2w5VZEhfGPyc1YKJlSJpcA 95wv1V8MWXypX2WLq/+QwiJj4GX7outwwaPPhQdD1RN0bpG7nXpeyiRmeAUiN511hu2LnqGZA7 aRp/R6ZN/ixtmNP0Jh8JQrpzo5v8CTxe6DmeafwZLynhkiu+0wRolkPeDK2ljVHVup8rS+0fOO IVjF1Ql5GGPHe3T/GkMYG6k3JuoJEe31jyQjXReHFR3GaFJibjVMdhhkKfUPw+gEkDRyi+qUSR TlHoJHSW5KxWyZoO1bbj/NQh Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com ([10.248.3.37]) by uls-op-cesaep01.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Feb 2020 15:41:01 -0800 IronPort-SDR: k80GSDcXwbQoTzKS4R3wf7sH+e9W3S8sILd6sTvcP49jK+mvOpkh3Op5Zh9Ot1XovMGUyxuvzS Y5+WRDPSGOJjagOjw6M2pM2rm8BmYFQswAjn9ov1u0XywiZ8a8NK58gUZyiZDb3P0wvbfr7qA6 fttFvdXiH2XKpugUc2FO5GWVN+bPBkPY4iLXiuMIq0pnmuVcYKyxzriL9K+OaFaNQN+kIf1WMT MM/xPHMoE8nP1w2fy+oqIvLLo1lr3tMec22JK+idb+rYaIdsJV8k6nksX6vki41dSc1g/ATl2B Sf4= WDCIronportException: Internal Received: from unknown (HELO redsun52) ([10.149.66.28]) by uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Feb 2020 15:48:13 -0800 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 23:48:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Pedro Alves cc: Tom Tromey , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "binutils@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure: Re-disable building cross-gdbserver In-Reply-To: <23ccb2bf-7e7a-3896-cc87-fd5398a158ca@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <87a75p9mg9.fsf@tromey.com> <23ccb2bf-7e7a-3896-cc87-fd5398a158ca@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LFD 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00834.txt.bz2 On Wed, 12 Feb 2020, Pedro Alves wrote: > > That's actually quite similar to what I considered first, before I > > changed my mind. Whatever. > > Doing it in gdbserver/ has the advantage that it stays under gdbserver's > control, so it doesn't need syncing code with the gcc tree. I know of at > least one off-tree port that uses gdbserver in a host != target scenario, > so I imagine that this condition will evolve over time. Sure, that makes sense to me. > > case "${host}" in > > + ${target}) > > + gdbserver_host=${host} > > + ;; > > + *) > > + gdbserver_host=NONE > > + ;; > if/else reads more to-the-point to me, so I tweaked it that > way, and merged it in (to binutils-gdb), like below. Great, thanks for handling this! > I'm sorry for not noticing your earlier patch. No worries, I'm glad we've got this sorted. Maciej