From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-248451-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28657 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2009 16:06:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 28587 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Sep 2009 16:06:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from cantor2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:06:01 +0000
Received: from relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) 	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEA08640B; 	Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:05:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:06:00 -0000
From: Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Merge from LTO: eh_personality changes
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0909101757340.28140@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0909101805290.28140@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0909041532090.28140@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <4AA293E4.8090301@redhat.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.0909051914110.28140@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <4AA2A9D7.3030406@redhat.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.0909081435050.28140@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>  <alpine.LNX.2.00.0909081718330.28140@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <4AA67D0C.8000704@redhat.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.0909101506250.28140@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <alpine.LNX.2.00.0909101629330.28140@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <alpine.LNX.2.00.0909101652010.28140@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>  <4AA92044.3050800@redhat.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.0909101757340.28140@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00707.txt.bz2

On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Richard Henderson wrote:
> 
> > > *** gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c.orig	2009-09-10 13:40:45.000000000 +0200
> > > --- gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c	2009-09-10 14:18:42.000000000 +0200
> > > *************** gfc_maybe_initialize_eh (void)
> > > *** 1155,1164 ****
> > >        return;
> > > 
> > >      gfc_eh_initialized_p = true;
> > > !   eh_personality_libfunc
> > > !     = init_one_libfunc (USING_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS
> > > !                        ? "__gcc_personality_sj0"
> > > !                        : "__gcc_personality_v0");
> > >      default_init_unwind_resume_libfunc ();
> > >      using_eh_for_cleanups ();
> > >    }
> > > --- 1155,1164 ----
> > >        return;
> > > 
> > >      gfc_eh_initialized_p = true;
> > > !   eh_personality_decl
> > > !     = build_personality_function (USING_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS
> > > ! 				  ? "__gcc_personality_sj0"
> > > ! 				  : "__gcc_personality_v0");
> > 
> > Surely Fortran can simply avoid setting this up at all?
> 
> Good question - I'll check.

No.  It needs it for OMP and the MUST_NOT_THROW regions that generates.

Richard.