From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-271238-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10896 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2010 10:01:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 10862 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Aug 2010 10:01:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from cantor.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.2)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:01:00 +0000
Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2])	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB00990847;	Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:00:57 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:26:00 -0000
From: Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, matz@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Do not check whether memory references accessed in every iteration trap.
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimVuT0gju=A7uFEx+vYbUvjTdyNwrVhKJvjOiYJ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1008241159290.28912@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
References: <1278625285-12667-1-git-send-email-sebpop@gmail.com> <1278625285-12667-4-git-send-email-sebpop@gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1008131102000.25856@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <AANLkTimyD+yOC4+KM1EUxNmmNCaXkPL36kO1qF56YrSM@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1008181121230.28912@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <AANLkTi=nJwO7XT8vBvugm+sGLN2i4_L1=fQCiSzHXZr3@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1008182038150.28912@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <AANLkTimVuT0gju=A7uFEx+vYbUvjTdyNwrVhKJvjOiYJ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg01784.txt.bz2

On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Sebastian Pop wrote:

> >> I will prepare the combined patch if you think that this is a better
> >> form.
> >
> > Yes, I like that better.
> 
> I sent out the new combined patches.
> Ok for trunk after regstrap?

Now I just noticed that -ftree-loop-if-convert-memory-writes is long
for -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores.  But I suppose it doesn't really
matter.  The patches are ok (with or without changing the option
name - whatever you prefer).

Thanks,
Richard.