From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31438 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2011 21:53:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 31421 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jan 2011 21:53:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay02.pair.com (HELO relay02.pair.com) (209.68.5.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:53:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 65859 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2011 21:53:25 -0000 Received: from 195.135.221.2 (HELO d95.suse.de) (195.135.221.2) by relay02.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Jan 2011 21:53:25 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 195.135.221.2 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:35:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Mike Stump cc: Rainer Orth , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Janis Johnson , Arnaud Charlet , Richard Guenther Subject: Re: Unreviewed testsuite patches In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <44EE7EC2-A9C9-4A76-B47F-7C4B0CE01C3B@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg01934.txt.bz2 On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Mike Stump wrote: > Well, if there isn't a problem, then no solution is necessary. So, the > question is, do we have a problem? I ask, because having a problem is > probably a prerequisite to solving it. Yes, we definitely have a problem. And one possible volunteer who raised his hand triggered by this e-mail exchange. ;-) Anyone else interested and knowledgable to help out here, drop me a (private) e-mail, please! Gerald