From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30185 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2011 10:44:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 30167 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2011 10:44:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cantor.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:44:46 +0000 Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1786CB00; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:44:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:44:00 -0000 From: Richard Guenther To: Diego Novillo Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Make called function type explicit, make function pointer type conversions useless In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00850.txt.bz2 On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Diego Novillo wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:49, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > I'll leave this for comments over the weekend, and if there are none > > will go ahead and check this in early next week. > > The approach looks fine to me. Thanks. I have now applied this after re-bootstrapping and testing on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Richard.