From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27409 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2012 13:18:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 27399 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Apr 2012 13:18:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-51.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:18:02 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.129] (vie-188-118-252-102.dsl.sil.at [188.118.252.102]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C05173F41C; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 09:18:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:18:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Sriraman Tallam cc: reply@codereview.appspotmail.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Support for Runtime CPU type detection via builtins (issue5754058) In-Reply-To: <20120330001021.9E30EB2086@azwildcat.mtv.corp.google.com> Message-ID: References: <20120330001021.9E30EB2086@azwildcat.mtv.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00395.txt.bz2 On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > Hi, > > I have made a new patch to only have two builtins : > > * __builtin_cpu_is ("") > * __builtin_cpu_supports ("") > > apart from the cpu init builtin, __builtin_cpu_init. I don't see any .texi file as part of this change. Shouldn't this be documented (and also added to the release notes gcc-4.8/changes.html)? > List of CPU names : > > * "amd" > * "intel" Are company names really suitable here? Intel is also still producing ia64 aka Itanium, and in the future AMD might do some ARM-based designs. AMD64 and Intel64 might work. Gerald