public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New configuration options to enable additional executable/startfile/shared library prefixes
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 23:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1211020017110.2266@tuna.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121101211727.GA7077@ibm-tiger.the-meissners.org>

On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Michael Meissner wrote:
> 	* doc/install.texi (--with-extra-prefix=): Document new configure
> 	switches.
> 	(--with-extra-exec-prefix=): Likewise.
> 	(--with-extra-startfile-prefix=): Likewise.
> 	(--with-extra-rpath-prefix=): Likewise.

+On powerpc64-linux systems, the dynamic linker will be searched for in
+the directories specified by the prefixed, that is used instead of the
                                  ^^^^^^^^
+standard system dynamic linker.

Is the use of "prefixed" correct her, or would that be "prefixes"?

+In addition on powerpc64-linux systems, if the user used static

"the user used" comes across a bit oddly.  How about "requests"?

+linking, as well as the @option{-mcpu=} option, the linker will be

Do I understand this correctly that both must hold?  Perhaps say "plus"
to avoid any ambiguity?

+for that particular machine.  If dynamic linking is used, these cpu
+tuned libraries will not be searched, since the dynamic linker will
+load the appropriate cpu tuned library, based on the system that is
+executing the code.

CPU (uppercase) in two cases.

+@item --with-extra-rpath-prefix=@var{prefixes}
+Specify additional directories for finding shared libraries when
+the compiler is run.  Each prefix is separated by the standard path
+sepator (usually colon, @option{:}).  By default no extra prefixes are
+used.  If this option is used, each of the directories if they exist
+will be specified to the linker via the @option{-rpath=} option.

"each of the directories if they exist" is a bit confusing ("each"
versus "they").

Do you mean "each of the directories that exists on the build system
will be..." or something like that?

Gerald

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-01 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-01 22:54 Michael Meissner
2012-11-01 23:22 ` Gerald Pfeifer [this message]
2012-11-02 18:01   ` Michael Meissner
2012-11-03 23:01 ` David Edelsohn
2012-11-05 17:27   ` Michael Meissner
2012-11-06 14:59     ` David Edelsohn
2012-12-05 19:47 ` Ping: " Michael Meissner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.00.1211020017110.2266@tuna.site \
    --to=gerald@pfeifer.com \
    --cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).