From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5342 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2013 22:02:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 5322 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jan 2013 22:02:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-51.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 22:01:57 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.129] (vie-188-118-252-092.dsl.sil.at [188.118.252.92]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71AED3F410; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 17:01:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 22:02:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Andrew Pinski cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Update my entry into the contributions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg01293.txt.bz2 On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, Andrew Pinski wrote: > I thought I would update my entry which just mentions the bug work > which I have done. I mentioned pointer plus and other optimizations > in the new entry. Okay. Just give others two, three days to chime in if I am missing something. And, should it read GIMPLE? > I think other people should update their own entry also. Absolutely! Geald