Re: [df-scan.c] Optimise DF_REFs ordering in collection_rec, use HARD_REG_SETs instead of bitmaps

[Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@gmx.net>]

To document the gains from the bitmaps, here is (part of) the annotated 
source from callgrind profiler, showing instruction count. Before:


  1,154,400      if (bitmap_bit_p(regs_invalidated_by_call_regset, i)
  8,080,800  => bitmap.c:bitmap_bit_p (192400x)
  1,021,200          && !bitmap_bit_p (&defs_generated, i)
  5,106,000  => bitmap.c:bitmap_bit_p (170200x)
    340,400          && (!is_sibling_call
          .              || !bitmap_bit_p (df->exit_block_uses, i)
          .              || refers_to_regno_p (i, i+1,
          .                                    crtl->return_rtx, NULL)))
  2,053,500        df_ref_record (DF_REF_BASE, collection_rec, regno_reg_rtx[i
35,279,934  => df-scan.c:df_ref_record (170200x)
          .                       NULL, bb, insn_info, DF_REF_REG_DEF,
          .                       DF_REF_MAY_CLOBBER | flags);
          .      }


After:


  1,346,800      if (TEST_HARD_REG_BIT(regs_invalidated_by_call, i)
    510,600          && !TEST_HARD_REG_BIT (defs_generated, i)
    340,400          && (!is_sibling_call
          .              || !bitmap_bit_p (df->exit_block_uses, i)
          .              || refers_to_regno_p (i, i+1,
          .                                    crtl->return_rtx, NULL)))
  2,057,200        df_ref_record (DF_REF_BASE, collection_rec, regno_reg_rtx[i
35,279,934  => df-scan.c:df_ref_record (170200x)
          .                       NULL, bb, insn_info, DF_REF_REG_DEF,
          .                       DF_REF_MAY_CLOBBER | flags);
          .      }



Dimitris