From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3213 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2011 06:59:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 3203 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jul 2011 06:59:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (HELO mailout-de.gmx.net) (213.165.64.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 06:59:43 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Jul 2011 06:59:41 -0000 Received: from mon.egee-see.org (EHLO [139.91.70.93]) [139.91.70.93] by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 08 Jul 2011 08:59:41 +0200 Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 07:04:00 -0000 From: Dimitrios Apostolou To: Steven Bosscher cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [df-scan.c] Optimise DF_REFs ordering in collection_rec, use HARD_REG_SETs instead of bitmaps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LNX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00585.txt.bz2 On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: >> The attached patch does two things for df_get_call_refs(): > > How did you test this patch? > > Normally, a patch submission comes with text like, "Bootstrapped & > tested on ..., no regressions.". Also, you chould write a ChangeLog > entry, best included in your mail somewhere at the end ;-) Hi Steven, thanks for the instructions. I've not run the mandatory tests you have told me about, only done some minor testing due to lack of time. I'm not yet posting patches for inclusion, but more as an RFC. Should such patches be sent to gcc instead of gcc-patches? Thanks, Dimitris