From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 120242 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2016 10:35:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 120224 invoked by uid 89); 19 Oct 2016 10:35:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=repeated X-HELO: smtp.ispras.ru Received: from bran.ispras.ru (HELO smtp.ispras.ru) (83.149.199.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:35:11 +0000 Received: from monopod.intra.ispras.ru (monopod.intra.ispras.ru [10.10.3.121]) by smtp.ispras.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E4C60E84; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:35:09 +0300 (MSK) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:35:00 -0000 From: Alexander Monakov To: Bernd Schmidt cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Nathan Sidwell Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] NVPTX offloading to NVPTX: backend patches In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1476463189-22540-1-git-send-email-amonakov@ispras.ru> <6e6106d4-3ae9-54e2-c1d3-99a2580297dc@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20.13 (LNX 116 2015-12-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg01516.txt.bz2 On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > [...] but then I think we shouldn't repeat the mistakes we made with OpenACC I think it would be good if you'd mention for posterity what, specifically, the mistakes were, in particular if you want those not to be repeated in the context of OpenMP offloading. Alexander