From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-213729-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6172 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2008 13:03:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 6163 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Mar 2008 13:03:15 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:02:46 +0000
Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux [128.131.111.60]) 	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356FF39110; 	Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:02:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 1203) 	id 5E26B1004E; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:02:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B13910046; 	Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:02:43 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:03:00 -0000
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
cc: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,      Andreas Tobler <andreast-list@fgznet.ch>,      GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, bkorb@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Status of the 4.1 branch
In-Reply-To: <000d01c88237$1e92d2d0$6401a8c0@glap>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0803131357490.22304@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <47C50AB2.7000002@fgznet.ch>   <Pine.GSO.4.58.0802270923001.9101@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>   <47C5B89F.5000403@fgznet.ch> <84fc9c000802271437x4809fd39p77a9bc1292a9dc61@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.1.00.0803092153000.22304@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>  <000d01c88237$1e92d2d0$6401a8c0@glap>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 955 2008-03-06)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00799.txt.bz2

On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> Is it time to close the 4.1 branch?  We have four active branches at
> the moment, which is probably too many.

The question is if anyone is using that branch.  If someone is, and
would keep maintaining the branch locally (or as a different branch
in the gcc.gnu.org SVN) I guess it's neutral.  If more than one party
is using it, it seems preferrably to keep this in the open.

I could stop doing weekly snapshots and only run one upon specific
request.

Again, I don't have a personal preference either way, so I'm looking
for input. :-)

Gerald