From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10324 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2009 19:25:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 10306 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Oct 2009 19:25:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:25:37 +0000 Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144A81E058; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:25:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 1203) id 1BF031005D; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:25:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0928010059; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:25:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:30:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Dave Korn cc: yuri@rawbw.com, GCC Patches , Java Patches Subject: Re: Is gcj dead? In-Reply-To: <4AD85D71.7040100@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <4AD846B0.2080102@rawbw.com> <4AD85D71.7040100@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.99 (LSU 1142 2008-08-13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg01068.txt.bz2 On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Dave Korn wrote: > Yuri makes a good point. Here's an update. > > htdocs/java/ChangeLog: > > * index.html: Mention recent windows updates. > > Ok? I am wondering whether that shouldn't go to our main page, and a reference from the older java/news to that one added? It's not that we have too many news items on our main page, either. Gerald