From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19898 invoked by alias); 15 May 2010 23:56:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 19890 invoked by uid 22791); 15 May 2010 23:56:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 May 2010 23:56:02 +0000 Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFD81E074; Sun, 16 May 2010 01:55:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 1203) id 951BB1604A; Sun, 16 May 2010 01:56:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8359616048; Sun, 16 May 2010 01:56:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 23:56:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: "Joseph S. Myers" cc: Jakub Jelinek , Jason Merrill , Ian Lance Taylor , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] alphanumeric (was: Patch ping) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20100510170818.GB2817@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.99 (LSU 1142 2008-08-13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg01145.txt.bz2 On Thu, 13 May 2010, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >>> OK with "alpha numeric" changed to "alphanumeric". >> Should we also document this? (Merriam-Webster agrees, FWIW.) > Yes, I think this should be documented. Done. http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html Gerald