[testsuite] XFAIL gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c execution on Solaris 11

[testsuite] XFAIL gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c execution on Solaris 11

[Rainer Orth]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 544 bytes --]

As described in PR middle-end/60092, gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c execution
FAILs at -O0 on Solaris 11.  posix_memalign modifies it's first arg in
the error case, which is at least a QOI issue.

Therefore I'd like to XFAIL the test like this.  Tested with the
appropriate runtest invocation on i386-pc-solaris2.10,
i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, and
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

Ok for mainline?

	Rainer


2014-02-18  Rainer Orth  <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

	* gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c: xfail execution on *-*-solaris2.11* at -O0.


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: testsuite-pr60092-sol11.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 609 bytes --]

# HG changeset patch
# Parent 6bae6f59c3da3dbde951b8044014c788747c3849
XFAIL gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c execution on Solaris 11

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-do run } */
 /* { dg-require-weak "" } */
+/* { dg-xfail-run-if "posix_memalign modifies first arg on error" { *-*-solaris2.11* } { "-O0" } } */
 
 typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
 extern int posix_memalign(void **memptr, size_t alignment, size_t size) __attribute__((weak));

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University

Re: [testsuite] XFAIL gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c execution on Solaris 11

[Richard Biener]

On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Rainer Orth wrote:

> As described in PR middle-end/60092, gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c execution
> FAILs at -O0 on Solaris 11.  posix_memalign modifies it's first arg in
> the error case, which is at least a QOI issue.
> 
> Therefore I'd like to XFAIL the test like this.  Tested with the
> appropriate runtest invocation on i386-pc-solaris2.10,
> i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, and
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
> 
> Ok for mainline?

Ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

> 	Rainer
> 
> 
> 2014-02-18  Rainer Orth  <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
> 
> 	* gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c: xfail execution on *-*-solaris2.11* at -O0.