From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17079 invoked by alias); 16 May 2014 16:56:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17055 invoked by uid 89); 16 May 2014 16:56:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 May 2014 16:56:29 +0000 Received: from [172.19.248.128] (unknown [64.88.227.134]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 370513F41C; Fri, 16 May 2014 12:56:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 16:56:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Mike Stump cc: Kenneth Zadeck , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: we are starting the wide int merge In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <5368FD99.2010607@naturalbridge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg01306.txt.bz2 On Sat, 10 May 2014, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Since (at least) 16:40 UTC that day my i386-unknown-freebsd10.0 builds > fail as follows: > > Comparing stages 2 and 3 > warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs > warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs > warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs > Bootstrap comparison failure! > gcc/fold-const.o differs > gcc/simplify-rtx.o differs > gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.o differs > > (FreeBSD/i386 really builds for i486, but retains the original name; > I'm traveling with limited access, but would not be surprised for this > to also show up for i386-*-linux-gnu or i486-*-linux-gnu.) Is anybody able to reproduce this, for example on a GNU/Linux system? This tester of mine hasn't been able to bootstrap for nearly a week, and timing-wise it would be really a coincidence were this not due to wide-int. Gerald