From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 419 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2015 21:21:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 382 invoked by uid 89); 4 Feb 2015 21:21:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 21:21:35 +0000 Received: from tuna.dhcp.nue.suse.com (nat.nue.novell.com [195.135.221.2]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8393D3F445; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:21:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 21:21:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: David Malcolm cc: jit@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Jeff Law Subject: Re: [PATCH] More fixes for update_web_docs_svn for jit docs (PR jit/64257) In-Reply-To: <1423077032.29180.125.camel@surprise> Message-ID: References: <1423074736-47636-1-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> <1423077032.29180.125.camel@surprise> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00287.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 2015-02-04 14:10, David Malcolm wrote: > Gerald: Please can you do the "svn up" on the relevant machine again, > so that it gets the updated "update_web_docs_svn"? That was my plan, yes. :-) I just did that and manually ran the script, and it seems to work. Still, do you think you can add a bit of error handling such that an issue like the one we had (cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gccadmin/2015-q1/msg00077.html ) does not kill the entire script? A bit of resilience would be good. Gerald