From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move X - (X / Y) * Y folding to match.pd
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 07:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1506290931290.26650@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1506271524590.1949@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>
On Sat, 27 Jun 2015, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> > This is an attempt to move one pattern from fold-const.c to match.pd.
> > It ought to be 1:1, but is not, e.g. with this patch we won't fold e.g.
> >
> > int
> > f (int a, int b)
> > {
> > return a - (unsigned) ((a / b) * b)
> > }
> >
> > anymore, but we're able to fold
> >
> > int
> > ff (int a, unsigned int b)
> > {
> > return a - ((a / b) * b);
> > }
> >
> > and fold-const.c is not.
Interesting.
> > I played around with converts, but didn't find
> > anything that would work well. Any suggestions how to make this pattern
> > better?
>
> Anything wrong with this?
>
> +/* X - (X / Y) * Y is the same as X % Y. */
> +(simplify
> + (minus (convert? @0) (convert? (mult (trunc_div @0 @1) @1)))
> + (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) || VECTOR_INTEGER_TYPE_P (type))
> + (convert (trunc_mod @0 @1))))
Yes. Eventually even (convert? (mult (convert1? (trunc_div ...)?
Of course with matching @0 between the two operands of the minus
you constrain types quite a bit.
I'd say just single-step through fold and see what types it get
present when folding a - (unsigned) ((a / b) * b).
Thanks,
Richard.
> (the other div/mod pairs could benefit from the same transformation as long as
> there are no conversions, but the conversion seems easier to handle with
> trunc_)
>
> > diff --git gcc/match.pd gcc/match.pd
> > index b2f8429..2bc158b 100644
> > --- gcc/match.pd
> > +++ gcc/match.pd
> > @@ -238,6 +238,12 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
> > && tree_nop_conversion_p (type, TREE_TYPE (@1)))
> > (trunc_mod @0 (convert @1))))
> >
> > +/* X - (X / Y) * Y is the same as X % Y. */
> > +(simplify
> > + (minus @0 (mult (trunc_div @0 @1) @1))
> > + (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) || VECTOR_INTEGER_TYPE_P (type))
> > + (trunc_mod @0 @1)))
> > +
> > /* Optimize TRUNC_MOD_EXPR by a power of two into a BIT_AND_EXPR,
> > i.e. "X % C" into "X & (C - 1)", if X and C are positive.
> > Also optimize A % (C << N) where C is a power of 2,
> >
> > Marek
> >
>
>
--
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-29 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-26 16:39 Marek Polacek
2015-06-27 14:53 ` Marc Glisse
2015-06-29 7:58 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2015-06-29 14:04 ` Marek Polacek
2015-06-29 14:09 ` Richard Biener
2015-06-29 22:26 ` Marc Glisse
2015-06-30 7:45 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.11.1506290931290.26650@zhemvz.fhfr.qr \
--to=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=polacek@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).