From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-408003-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 115260 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2015 07:49:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 115250 invoked by uid 89); 22 Sep 2015 07:49:18 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: fencepost.gnu.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (208.118.235.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 07:49:16 +0000
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53327)	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)	(Exim 4.82)	(envelope-from <rguenther@suse.de>)	id 1ZeIKA-0005No-7I	for gcc-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 03:49:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <rguenther@suse.de>)	id 1ZeIK6-0004GL-Go	for gcc-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 03:49:13 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:47606)	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <rguenther@suse.de>)	id 1ZeIK6-0004G2-Au	for gcc-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 03:49:10 -0400
Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254])	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C50EAAAD;	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 07:49:08 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:13:00 -0000
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Tom de Vries <Tom_deVries@mentor.com>
cc: "gcc-patches@gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][PR67666] Handle single restrict pointer in struct in create_variable_info_for_1
In-Reply-To: <5600FBFA.2090300@mentor.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1509220948590.24931@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
References: <5600FBFA.2090300@mentor.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LSU 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic]
X-Received-From: 195.135.220.15
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg01628.txt.bz2

On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Consider this test-case:
> 
> struct ps
> {
>   int *__restrict__ p;
> };
> 
> void
> f (struct ps &__restrict__ ps1)
> {
>   *(ps1.p) = 1;
> }
> 
> 
> Atm, the restrict on p has no effect. Now, say we add a field to the struct:
> 
> struct ps
> {
>   int *__restrict__ p;
>   int a;
> };
> 
> 
> Then the restrict on p does have the desired effect.
> 
> 
> This patch fixes the handling of structs with a single field in alias
> analysis.
> 
> Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
> 
> OK for trunk?

Ok.

Thanks,
Richard.