[PATCH, wwwdocs] Add -march=skylake-avx512 to gcc-6/changes.html.

[PATCH, wwwdocs] Add -march=skylake-avx512 to gcc-6/changes.html.

[Kirill Yukhin]

Hello,
Patch in the bottom adds mentioning of new
`march=skylake-avx512' to gcc-6/changes.html.

Is it ok to install?

This switch was backported to gcc-5.
Is it ok to create a new section `GCC 5.3' and put it there
or I need to wait for actual release?

--
Thanks, K

Index: htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -p -r1.36 changes.html
*** htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html   12 Oct 2015 16:55:25 -0000      1.36
--- htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html   16 Oct 2015 12:24:54 -0000
*************** enum {
*** 188,193 ****
--- 188,197 ----

  <h3 id="x86">IA-32/x86-64</h3>
     <ul>
+      <li>GCC now supports the Intel CPU named Skylake with AVX-512 extensions
+       through <code>-march=skylake-avx512</code>. The switch enables following
+       ISA extensions: AVX-512F, AVX512VL, AVX-512CD, AVX-512BW, AVX-512DQ.
+      </li>
       <li>
         Support for new AMD instructions <code>monitorx</code> and
         <code>mwaitx</code> has been added. This includes new intrinsic

Re: [PATCH, wwwdocs] Add -march=skylake-avx512 to gcc-6/changes.html.

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Is it ok to install?

Yes, just add a "the" before "following".

> This switch was backported to gcc-5.
> Is it ok to create a new section `GCC 5.3' and put it there
> or I need to wait for actual release?

How about if you add it now, and add "(pending)" to that title?

Gerald

Re: [PATCH, wwwdocs] Add -march=skylake-avx512 to gcc-6/changes.html.

[Kirill Yukhin]

On 17 Oct 02:37, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > Is it ok to install?
> 
> Yes, just add a "the" before "following".
> 
> > This switch was backported to gcc-5.
> > Is it ok to create a new section `GCC 5.3' and put it there
> > or I need to wait for actual release?
> 
> How about if you add it now, and add "(pending)" to that title?

Thanks a lot, Gerald. I've implemented both suggestions.

Checked in.
> 
> Gerald

--
Thanks, K