From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-429293-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 109747 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2016 10:33:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109731 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jun 2016 10:33:59 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:647
X-HELO: mx2.suse.de
Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 10:33:56 +0000
Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254])	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9738AAEF;	Wed,  8 Jun 2016 10:33:52 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 10:33:00 -0000
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
cc: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>,     Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com>,     gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix SLP wrong-code with VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (PR tree-optimization/71259)
In-Reply-To: <20160608103220.GA7387@tucnak.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1606081233220.1493@t29.fhfr.qr>
References: <20160111171343.GB18720@tucnak.redhat.com> <CAMbmDYaE0P0VEUu9mJT17SAZAtQhyFQ6VqPvS_-xjNqx9zGv0Q@mail.gmail.com> <20160603173343.GM7387@tucnak.redhat.com> <CAKdteOau6DxGK_6rbr7=ZFF=3zek7XhOSDQhTkprM4m_uCmCHw@mail.gmail.com> <20160607092816.GO7387@tucnak.redhat.com> <CAKdteOao+DTx-KMgKcQu3Fzz_MEhqvh-eqzLKWnSHn=Pk5bR8A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1606081226060.1493@t29.fhfr.qr> <20160608103220.GA7387@tucnak.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LSU 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg00566.txt.bz2

On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 12:26:17PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > So: should I change dg-options into dg-additional-options for all the
> > > tests for consistency, or only on the 3 ones where it makes them pass?
> > > (pr71259.c, vect-shift-2-big-array.c, vect-shift-2.c)
> > 
> > I think all tests should use dg-additional-options.
> 
> All tests in {gcc,g++}.dg/vect/, right?  I agree with that.

Yes.  [and most of the vect.exp fancy-filename stuff should be replaced
by adding dg-additional-options]

Richard.