From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-443913-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26315 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2016 12:57:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26273 invoked by uid 89); 9 Dec 2016 12:57:16 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:319
X-HELO: mx2.suse.de
Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 12:57:12 +0000
Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254])	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1971ABC3;	Fri,  9 Dec 2016 12:57:09 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 12:57:00 -0000
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: 3 further backports to 6.3
In-Reply-To: <20161209125014.GB3541@tucnak.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1612091357020.5294@t29.fhfr.qr>
References: <20161209125014.GB3541@tucnak.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LSU 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg00776.txt.bz2

On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> My tree-ssa-reassoc.c fix backport for 6 branch depends on 2 other patches,
> where the testcases don't fail on the branch for those 2, but the issue has
> been just latent.  Are these ok to backport to 6.3 too?

Yes.

Thanks,
Richard.