From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 99431 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2015 12:15:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 99410 invoked by uid 89); 6 Apr 2015 12:15:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 12:15:27 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.133] (vie-91-186-144-236.dsl.sil.at [91.186.144.236]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A244D3F47D; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 08:15:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 12:15:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Mike Stump cc: Jeff Law , Andreas Krebbel , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [wwwdocs] svnwrite.html PATCH for Re: [PATCH] Fix hoist-register-pressure testcases for -m31 on s390x In-Reply-To: <4FB1CEFB-F9C9-4795-917A-EB2218363072@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20150219172754.GC9261@maggie> <54E782C1.9050007@redhat.com> <4FB1CEFB-F9C9-4795-917A-EB2218363072@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="8336693-664948819-1428322524=:9357" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00183.txt.bz2 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8336693-664948819-1428322524=:9357 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-length: 1489 On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, Mike Stump wrote: >> Yes. ISTM that this kind of patch (twiddling target conditionals in >> the testsuite) should be OK for a target maintainer to apply without >> requesting approval, even though it's not in the backend proper. > Yes, thatÂ’s right. I tried to capture this in our documentation now and applied the patch below. Let me know if you'd like to see this tweaked. Gerald Index: svnwrite.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/svnwrite.html,v retrieving revision 1.33 diff -u -r1.33 svnwrite.html --- svnwrite.html 14 Jul 2014 09:45:48 -0000 1.33 +++ svnwrite.html 6 Apr 2015 12:13:12 -0000 @@ -107,9 +107,10 @@

This is for people who have primary responsibility for ports, front ends, or other specific aspects of the compiler. These folks are allowed to make changes to areas they maintain and related - documentation, web pages, and test cases without approval from - anyone else, and approve other people's changes in those areas. They - must get approval for changes elsewhere in the compiler.

+ documentation, web pages, and test cases (and target conditionals) + without approval from anyone else, and approve other people's changes + in those areas. + They must get approval for changes elsewhere in the compiler.

Maintainers of a port maintain the relevant files in gcc/config, documentation, web pages, and test cases --8336693-664948819-1428322524=:9357--