From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16097 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2015 00:02:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16079 invoked by uid 89); 11 Apr 2015 00:02:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:02:00 +0000 Received: from tuna.dhcp.nue.suse.com (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CC1E3F428; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 20:01:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:02:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Georg-Johann Lay cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Eric Weddington , Denis Chertykov Subject: Re: [Patch,wwwdocs,AVR]: AVR release notes In-Reply-To: <4F3BE5AC.5090904@gjlay.de> Message-ID: References: <4F19B2BB.2020401@gjlay.de> <4F26A14D.4050207@gjlay.de> <4F3BDDD5.1040000@gjlay.de> <4F3BE5AC.5090904@gjlay.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00486.txt.bz2 On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > >> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html >> >> But there is a problem with the link to built-ins in onlinedocs. >> >> The HTML reads >> >>
  • Support for AVR-specific > href="http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/AVR-Built_002din-Functions.html">built-in >> functions has been added.
  • >> >> But that is not used literally but as >> "http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/AVR-Built-in-Functions.html" >> instead leading to 404 "Not found" error. >> >> It _002d link works from by local sandbox but not from the upstream version. >> >> What is the trick? > Hacked around it by escaping _002d as %5f002d so that _002d is not > resolved to - None of this should be necessary (and should not have been for 18 months or so), finally. :-) If you still run into anything, please let me know and I'll look into it. Gerald