From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 106394 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2017 14:01:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 104155 invoked by uid 89); 2 Jan 2017 14:01:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=seriously, 20161101, 2016-11-01, sake X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 14:01:29 +0000 Received: from [172.31.0.117] (sub-34ip117.rev.onenet.cw [190.88.34.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29E093F531; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 09:01:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 14:01:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Jakub Jelinek cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [committed] Fix up libgomp/hashtab.h license In-Reply-To: <20161101165206.GY3541@tucnak.redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20161101165206.GY3541@tucnak.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-01/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 On Tue, 1 Nov 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > libgomp is GPLv3 + runtime exception licensed, hashtab.h has been copied > and adjusted from include/ similarly how splay-tree.c has been changed, > the latter got the GPLv3 + runtime exception boiler plate, but not > hashtab.h. > > Fixed thusly, committed to trunk. Shall I backport to release branches? > > 2016-11-01 Jakub Jelinek > > * hashtab.h: Use standard GPLv3 with runtime exception > boilerplate. Not sure how many people would seriously use libgomp with GCC 5, so the backport to GCC 6 you did probably is sufficient. Just for the sake of consistency ("all active release branches"), GCC 5 might make sense, too? Gerald