From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 43630 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2017 17:25:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 43618 invoked by uid 89); 25 Feb 2017 17:25:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=person X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:25:48 +0000 Received: from anthias (vie-188-118-249-200.dsl.sil.at [188.118.249.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97B103F5EB; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:25:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:46:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: John David Anglin cc: Jeff Law , Jakub Jelinek , Florian Weimer , Carlos O'Donell , Jason Merrill , Bernd Edlinger , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement new hook for max_align_t_align In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <305D4697-79B3-4B69-8741-98BFC00A5ECE@bell.net> <856A3FEF-7A0D-43D4-9CBF-23939E7861C4@bell.net> <6C68EDB9-5933-4127-978E-807ABC7F31C7@bell.net> <519be582-d8e5-a6ef-f699-90a21250180b@bell.net> <88e889ee-dec9-5fef-db19-02f4d91d9156@redhat.com> <20161012072540.GJ7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <20161012080208.GK7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <6f8d9eff-adef-79a4-b67d-732106705d40@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg01552.txt.bz2 On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, John David Anglin wrote: >> It's really hard to make an argument to do anything other than deprecate >> that platform. Given John's ongoing involvement it's much harder to >> deprecate 64bit linux (and consequently 64bit hpux). > I believe that deprecating the 32-bit HP-UX platform makes sense. There > is no HP involvement in hppa, ia64 or alpha open source that I am aware > of, so deprecating gcc platforms with HP systems is reasonable. > > My primary focus is open source and one less platform will free some time. Sooo, why not deprecate 32-bit HP-UX with GCC 7? Now is still a good time doing so, from the release perspective, and if you as the maintainer (and pretty much only person active here) are in favor... Gerald