From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-449154-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 93591 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2017 22:32:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93433 invoked by uid 89); 25 Feb 2017 22:32:49 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:A3967F9, H*MI:sk:A3967F9, H*i:sk:A3967F9
X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 22:32:47 +0000
Received: from anthias (vie-188-118-249-200.dsl.sil.at [188.118.249.200])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EAC003F5D6;	Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:32:42 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 22:46:00 -0000
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>
cc: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,     Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,     Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>,     Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement new hook for max_align_t_align
In-Reply-To: <A3967F98-3FB7-44FD-8CD2-B26A4F257C11@bell.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1702252331390.2487@anthias.pfeifer.com>
References: <AM4PR0701MB2162DE85B0474298254BB955E4D90@AM4PR0701MB2162.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <305D4697-79B3-4B69-8741-98BFC00A5ECE@bell.net> <AM4PR0701MB21620703A5F16667523B065DE4D80@AM4PR0701MB2162.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <856A3FEF-7A0D-43D4-9CBF-23939E7861C4@bell.net> <6C68EDB9-5933-4127-978E-807ABC7F31C7@bell.net> <CADzB+2=XBG7d2Lp8UraKKYVjZzsEvxXM4tgVPN6ORn5ib=ztLQ@mail.gmail.com> <519be582-d8e5-a6ef-f699-90a21250180b@bell.net> <88e889ee-dec9-5fef-db19-02f4d91d9156@redhat.com> <20161012072540.GJ7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <ad86356d-db0e-58dc-a7e0-5603130c4bca@redhat.com> <20161012080208.GK7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <6f8d9eff-adef-79a4-b67d-732106705d40@redhat.com> <d499f576-e2d6-6590-6f1e-668472518042@bell.net> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1702251823250.2487@anthias.pfeifer.com> <A3967F98-3FB7-44FD-8CD2-B26A4F257C11@bell.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg01564.txt.bz2

On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, John David Anglin wrote:
>> Sooo, why not deprecate 32-bit HP-UX with GCC 7?
> GCC 7 is in reasonable shape on 32-bit HP-UX.  I'll do it after it is 
> released.

If you deprecate it with GCC 7, it'd be only removed with GCC 8.

On the other hand, if you deprecate it past GCC 7, removal would 
happen with GCC 9 (by default).

Gerald