From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] -fsanitize=pointer-overflow support (PR sanitizer/80998)
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 08:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1706211004540.22867@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170621080048.GN2123@tucnak>
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:41:43AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > 2) libcpp/line-map.c has this:
> > > static int
> > > location_adhoc_data_update (void **slot, void *data)
> > > {
> > > *((char **) slot) += *((int64_t *) data);
> > > return 1;
> > > }
> > > where the (why int64_t always?, we really need just intptr_t) adjusts
> > > one pointer from an unrelated one (result of realloc). That is a UB
> > > and actually can trigger this sanitization if the two regions are
> > > far away from each other, e.g. on i686-linux:
> > > ../../libcpp/line-map.c:102:21: runtime error: pointer index expression with base 0x0899e308 overflowed to 0xf74c4ab8
> > > ../../libcpp/line-map.c:102:21: runtime error: pointer index expression with base 0x08add7c0 overflowed to 0xf74c9a08
> > > ../../libcpp/line-map.c:102:21: runtime error: pointer index expression with base 0x092ba308 overflowed to 0xf741cab8
> > > ../../libcpp/line-map.c:102:21: runtime error: pointer index expression with base 0x0a3757c0 overflowed to 0xf7453a08
> > > Shall we perform the addition in uintptr_t instead to make it
> > > implementation defined rather than UB?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Here is a patch for 2), bootstrap-ubsan bootstrapped/regtested on
> x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
Ok.
Richard.
> Note both ptrdiff_t and uintptr_t are already used in libcpp, so I think
> it shouldn't create new portability issues.
>
> 2017-06-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> * line-map.c (location_adhoc_data_update): Perform addition in
> uintptr_t type rather than char * type. Read *data using
> ptrdiff_t type instead of int64_t.
> (get_combined_adhoc_loc): Change offset type to ptrdiff_t from
> int64_t.
>
> --- libcpp/line-map.c.jj 2017-06-19 08:28:18.000000000 +0200
> +++ libcpp/line-map.c 2017-06-20 16:43:25.193063344 +0200
> @@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ location_adhoc_data_eq (const void *l1,
> static int
> location_adhoc_data_update (void **slot, void *data)
> {
> - *((char **) slot) += *((int64_t *) data);
> + *((char **) slot)
> + = (char *) ((uintptr_t) *((char **) slot) + *((ptrdiff_t *) data));
> return 1;
> }
>
> @@ -221,7 +222,7 @@ get_combined_adhoc_loc (struct line_maps
> set->location_adhoc_data_map.allocated)
> {
> char *orig_data = (char *) set->location_adhoc_data_map.data;
> - int64_t offset;
> + ptrdiff_t offset;
> /* Cast away extern "C" from the type of xrealloc. */
> line_map_realloc reallocator = (set->reallocator
> ? set->reallocator
>
>
> Jakub
>
>
--
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-21 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-19 18:25 Jakub Jelinek
2017-06-20 7:41 ` Richard Biener
2017-06-20 8:14 ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-06-20 8:18 ` Richard Biener
2017-06-21 7:58 ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-06-21 8:04 ` Richard Biener
2017-06-21 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH] Fix pointer diff (was: -fsanitize=pointer-overflow support (PR sanitizer/80998)) Jakub Jelinek
2017-06-21 15:17 ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-06-21 16:27 ` Marc Glisse
2017-06-22 8:31 ` Richard Biener
2017-06-22 9:29 ` Marc Glisse
2017-06-22 9:46 ` Richard Biener
2017-07-01 16:41 ` Marc Glisse
2017-07-03 12:37 ` Richard Biener
2017-10-09 11:01 ` Marc Glisse
2017-10-19 15:11 ` Richard Biener
2017-10-28 13:04 ` Marc Glisse
2017-10-28 17:13 ` Richard Biener
2017-07-04 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH] -fsanitize=pointer-overflow support (PR sanitizer/80998) Jakub Jelinek
2017-06-21 8:00 ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-06-21 8:05 ` Richard Biener [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.20.1706211004540.22867@zhemvz.fhfr.qr \
--to=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=mliska@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).