From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-467631-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28625 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2017 08:54:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28549 invoked by uid 89); 22 Nov 2017 08:54:43 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mx2.suse.de
Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 08:54:42 +0000
Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254])	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B934ACA1;	Wed, 22 Nov 2017 08:54:40 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 09:00:00 -0000
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
cc: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>,     =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Martin_Li=A8ka?= <mliska@suse.cz>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix i?86 bootstrap (PR rtl-optimization/82044)
In-Reply-To: <20171122003015.GE14653@tucnak>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1711220954340.12252@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
References: <d430e94b-5ea6-0c5c-0dfc-a09e62e0fcbd@suse.cz> <20170920081519.GU1701@tucnak> <d7a78f76-ab66-09ed-06da-257038bc58bb@suse.cz> <7cff6742-bd7a-5ea2-80fb-aca74610f591@suse.cz> <7e976ae2-4aab-9abd-1990-94b9804db8f9@redhat.com> <87d09716-916c-974f-9a4e-7fa95f6b97c3@suse.cz> <20171121232720.GD14653@tucnak> <20171122003015.GE14653@tucnak>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LSU 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg01974.txt.bz2

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:27:20AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > The following patch fixes those two issues and adds similar overflow
> > check to record_store too (in that spot width is always non-negative, so
> > we don't need a special width == -1 handling).
> > 
> > Bootstrapped successfully on i686-linux, ok for trunk if it passes regtest
> > there (and pending x86_64-linux bootstrap + regtest)?
> 
> Now successfully bootstrapped/regtested on both.

Ok.

Richard.