From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-471943-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 76214 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2018 11:18:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76196 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jan 2018 11:18:23 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mx2.suse.de
Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:18:21 +0000
Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254])	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90070ACD2;	Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:18:19 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:31:00 -0000
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: "Koval, Julia" <julia.koval@intel.com>
cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,     GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,     Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yukhin@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [patch][x86] -march=icelake
In-Reply-To: <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F8A48C59D@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1801241217290.32271@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
References: <CAFULd4YbezpXsDTgOohBvY5u68tTb0vtL5bTBVtUcV4owJ4b9Q@mail.gmail.com> <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F8A45EE15@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> <CAFULd4anDT-gLMFv_YcH8+D_ZdUa5jZnpuxH4GOskP992UKNXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc0f=9R0d9vSXPA+0FVYFf7bhF4JCZnF15-ucsiFjMxt=A@mail.gmail.com> <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F8A461F0A@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> <20171219134931.GP2353@tucnak> <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F8A48A4CD@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> <20180122113610.GF2063@tucnak> <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F8A48A54B@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> <CAFULd4Y_YNZwXVorCEXFippjzXN4igQZbAnyJK0CRXYJgh6raQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180124110548.GA2063@tucnak> <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F8A48C59D@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LSU 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2018-01/txt/msg02014.txt.bz2

On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, Koval, Julia wrote:

> I think we may want to extend it to more than 2 ints someday, when we run out of bits again. It won't break the existing functionality if 3rd int will be zero by default. That's why I tried to avoid "two" in the name.
> 
> Julia
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:jakub@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 12:06 PM
> > To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>; Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
> > Cc: Koval, Julia <julia.koval@intel.com>; GCC Patches <gcc-
> > patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yukhin@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [patch][x86] -march=icelake
> > 
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:00:26PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Koval, Julia <julia.koval@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > Yes, you are right, any() is not required. Here is the patch.
> > >
> > > Please also attach ChangeLog.
> > >
> > > The patch is OK for x86 target, it needs global reviewer approval
> > > (Maybe Jakub, as the patch touches OMP part).
> > 
> > I don't like the new class name nor header name, bit_mask is way too generic
> > name for something very specialized (double hwi bitmask).
> > 
> > Richard, any suggestions for this?

Maybe wide_int_bitmask?  You could then even use fixed_wide_int <> as
"implementation".

Richard.