From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-506218-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 68420 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2019 12:16:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68409 invoked by uid 89); 5 Aug 2019 12:16:24 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:553
X-HELO: mx1.suse.de
Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:16:22 +0000
Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254])	by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A167AF26;	Mon,  5 Aug 2019 12:16:13 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:16:00 -0000
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,     Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC][x86] Fix PR91154, add SImode smax, allow SImode add in SSE regs
In-Reply-To: <CAFULd4Zy-pX9G3W4_zcWPQ961bKQup=pqGQJ8Cf5Qs40MXYZvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1908051414080.19626@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1907231548290.30921@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <ri6o91i32a4.fsf@suse.cz> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1907251405590.4958@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <CAFULd4ZEAOsRSGZ5SD7kOz2NLmkvkfd6X6v=vkTm99=NgxXZiw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFULd4b9LXOZyqLSSS5mz1r7xe71LiwXFAgm5=VZFRLE57E2cw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1907311309240.19626@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <CAFULd4YHaEZsYn8Ym_F61QZ52hFyG4bRwJPU6y3qtSj39xRBuw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1908011122550.19626@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <CAFULd4YmJ1W1is5F3oJCMdk0uKUsLUr6wei8K7TsVrPygBBwgA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908031923130.5283@rguenther-XPS-13-9380> <CAFULd4ams5g7J0PwqDpn-cPZcVa9niTqw5_BWVzGg6MtcDi8sQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1908051316260.19626@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <CAFULd4Zy-pX9G3W4_zcWPQ961bKQup=pqGQJ8Cf5Qs40MXYZvQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LSU 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2

On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Uros Bizjak wrote:

> > dimode_{scalar_to_vector_candidate_p,remove_non_convertible_regs}
> > functions to drop the dimode_ prefix - is that OK or do you
> > prefer some other prefix?
> 
> No, please just drop the prefix.

just noticed this applies to the derived dimode_scalar_chain class
as well where I can't simply drop the prefix.  So would
general_scalar_chain / 
general_{scalar_to_vector_candidate_p,remove_non_convertible_regs}
be OK?

Richard.