From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B45E03858D20 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:34:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B45E03858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B910A22767; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:34:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1689089698; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UZnwBcSdzQIq7s70e8b+lZ42QZdMsse4nitgKjKMNtY=; b=ItqGLLj7VFTv4RiZYQVT9sXnd3/lnXUgr9nOiOWy6HyQc+1uTZLmQTxQTpCzkiXwl3NfXp p9joYC4rtc2XtI1S3cVwGITBbSH59A5+aM8Vh5qJn316r30xe5tWlC4oXxcLVgxN3TGGHj OxobMuh0QOTLTzIXoGYOMLE64sWQrcc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1689089698; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UZnwBcSdzQIq7s70e8b+lZ42QZdMsse4nitgKjKMNtY=; b=VHU64C7nrZm2jFnFqXn/O2cvIhDW7HRNk3xc+9poQntXbCi5m8gGgc9JwS2GfstnanE47M lCrFOb8Nze/1FBCQ== Received: from wotan.suse.de (wotan.suse.de [10.160.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA1982C142; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wotan.suse.de (Postfix, from userid 10510) id 9F7FE67F5; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wotan.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4556610; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:34:58 +0000 (UTC) From: Michael Matz To: Alexander Monakov cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Jan Hubicka Subject: Re: [x86-64] RFC: Add nosse abi attribute In-Reply-To: <1222e0de-8260-9ba3-44fb-ec801fc3a4e2@ispras.ru> Message-ID: References: <1222e0de-8260-9ba3-44fb-ec801fc3a4e2@ispras.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LSU 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hey, On Tue, 11 Jul 2023, Alexander Monakov via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > > * nosseclobber: claims (and ensures) that xmm8-15 aren't clobbered > > > > > > This is the weak/active form; I'd suggest "preserve_high_sse". > > > > But it preserves only the low parts :-) You swapped the two in your > > mind when writing the reply? > > Ahhh. By "high SSE" I mean the high-numbered SSE regs, i.e. xmm8-15, not > the higher halves of (unspecified subset of) SSE regs. Ah, gotcha :-) It just shows that all these names are confusing. Maybe I'll just go with "attribute1" and "attribute2" and rely on docu. (SCNR) Ciao, Michael.