From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14826 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2017 18:04:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13400 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jun 2017 18:04:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=involvement, shame X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 18:04:23 +0000 Received: from ainaz.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4554A3F635; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 14:04:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from anthias (unknown [46.183.103.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D70D3F632; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 14:04:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 18:04:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Bernd Schmidt cc: Richard Biener , Jeff Law , GCC Patches Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <910afdec-d77f-f94e-2c7d-42b4abe50b57@t-online.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg00724.txt.bz2 On Tue, 30 May 2017, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 05/30/2017 09:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >> This leaves the nvptx and c6x ports without a maintainer. Do >> you have any recommendations for a successor here? > Not really. It would be a shame to lose the C6X port though. If I'm > CC'd on any bug reports I'm prepared to keep it working - if that's > considered sufficient, I can readd myself as maintainer. I think that would be preferrable. Even if practically it may not make a huge difference, people with less background/involvement will know who to contact, and having an entire port without maintainer just doesn't feel right. Gerald